Goodale v. Cooper

Appellate Court of Illinois

Goodale v. Cooper

6 Ill. App. 81, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 25

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 2, 1880

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 6 Ill. App. 81 (Goodale v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodale v. Cooper, 6 Ill. App. 81, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 25 (Ill. Ct. App. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Wall, J.

This was a suit before a justice of the peace, brought by the appellee against the appellant and one Thomas T. Brown, upon a delivery bond signed by the two defendants. Judgment having been rendered in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants appealed the case to the Circuit Court. In the Circuit Court the case was tried by the judge without the intervention of a jury, by consent of the plaintiff and the defendant Goodale, and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Goodale alone, for the penalty of the bond as debt, and for the sum of §39.20 as damages, and for the cost of suit. There was no judgment whatever as to the co-defendant Brown, though as shown by the record, he was properly in court; nor is there anything explaining or accounting for the fact that the case was not disposed of as to him. It is an inflexible rule that in actions ex contractu against two or more— if all are served with process judgment must go against all or none, and in this instance it was error to dispose of the case as to one defendant, without disposing of it as to the other, both defendants being before the court. To this rule the only exception is where there is a personal defense, such as infancy or bankruptcy. Dow v. Rattle, 12 Ill. 373; Gribben v. Thompson, 28 Ill. 61; Faulk v. Kellums, 54 Ill. 188; Kimball v. Ward, 63 Ill. 519; Byers v. Bank, etc., 85 Ill. 423. The judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wall, J.

This was a suit before a justice of the peace, brought by the appellee against the appellant and one Thomas T. Brown, upon a delivery bond signed by the two defendants. Judgment having been rendered in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants appealed the case to the Circuit Court. In the Circuit Court the case was tried by the judge without the intervention of a jury, by consent of the plaintiff and the defendant Goodale, and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Goodale alone, for the penalty of the bond as debt, and for the sum of §39.20 as damages, and for the cost of suit. There was no judgment whatever as to the co-defendant Brown, though as shown by the record, he was properly in court; nor is there anything explaining or accounting for the fact that the case was not disposed of as to him. It is an inflexible rule that in actions ex contractu against two or more— if all are served with process judgment must go against all or none, and in this instance it was error to dispose of the case as to one defendant, without disposing of it as to the other, both defendants being before the court. To this rule the only exception is where there is a personal defense, such as infancy or bankruptcy. Dow v. Rattle, 12 Ill. 373; Gribben v. Thompson, 28 Ill. 61; Faulk v. Kellums, 54 Ill. 188; Kimball v. Ward, 63 Ill. 519; Byers v. Bank, etc., 85 Ill. 423. The judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Ill. App. 81, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodale-v-cooper-illappct-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack