Good v. Thoms
This text of 15 F. App'x 240 (Good v. Thoms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[241]*241Respondent Maryellen Thoms appeals a district court order granting a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by this federal prisoner under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner Good has filed a motion for the appointment of counsel, and the government has responded to the motion. This appeal was held in abeyance pending decisions by the Supreme Court in Lopez v. Davis, No. 99-7504, and by this court in Powell v. Thoms, No. 99-5974. These cases have now been decided. See Lopez v. Davis, 531 U.S. 230, 121 S.Ct. 714, 718, 148 L.Ed.2d 635 (2001); Powell v. Thoms, No. 99-5974 (6th Cir. April 5, 2001) (unpublished order).
In Powell, the court noted that the petitioner had been released from custody, so the case was now moot. In this case, the home address for Good reflects that he, too, has been released from custody. Therefore, his appeal is also moot. In this situation, the proper procedure is to vacate the district court’s judgment and to remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss the petition as moot. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-40, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).
Accordingly, the motion for the appointment of counsel is denied, the judgment of the district court is vacated, and the case is remanded to the district court with directions to dismiss the petition as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 F. App'x 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/good-v-thoms-ca6-2001.