Home/New York Court of Appeals/Good v. Hults

Good v. Hults

200 N.E.2d 858, 14 N.Y.2d 907, 252 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1011
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 10, 1964
StatusPublished

This text of 200 N.E.2d 858 (Good v. Hults) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Good v. Hults, 200 N.E.2d 858, 14 N.Y.2d 907, 252 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1011 (N.Y. 1964).

Opinions

Order of Appellate Division modified insofar as it directs suspension of petitioner’s license, and the Commissioner’s determination annulled upon the ground that there is no substantial evidence to support it.

[909]*909Concur: Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Scileppi. Judge Dye dissents and votes to reverse and to reinstate the determination of the Commissioner in the following opinion in which Chief Judge Desmond and Judge Bergan concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Donahue v. Fletcher
86 N.E.2d 574 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 N.E.2d 858, 14 N.Y.2d 907, 252 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/good-v-hults-ny-1964.