Good v. Hults
200 N.E.2d 858, 14 N.Y.2d 907, 252 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1011
Opinions
Order of Appellate Division modified insofar as it directs suspension of petitioner’s license, and the Commissioner’s determination annulled upon the ground that there is no substantial evidence to support it.
[909]*909Concur: Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Scileppi. Judge Dye dissents and votes to reverse and to reinstate the determination of the Commissioner in the following opinion in which Chief Judge Desmond and Judge Bergan concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Good v. Hults, 200 N.E.2d 858, 14 N.Y.2d 907, 252 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1011 (N.Y. 1964).
200 N.E.2d 858 (Good v. Hults) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Donahue v. Fletcher
86 N.E.2d 574 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)