Good v. Department of Highways

16 Ct. Cl. 5
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedOctober 4, 1985
DocketCC-84-283
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Ct. Cl. 5 (Good v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Good v. Department of Highways, 16 Ct. Cl. 5 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Claimant alleges in his Notice of Claim that on October 19, 1984, at approximately 7:00 p.m., he was travelling east on Route 64 near Barboursville, West Virginia, when his vehicle struck a pothole. Damage to a wheel and tire amounted to $92.35.

At the hearing, claimant testified that construction was being done on the bridge. Cement barriers had been erected on both sides of the single lane. As claimant crossed the bridge, his 1980 Toyota Célica struck the hole. Claimant testified that he did not see the pothole until he struck it. He had travelled the same route a week before the accident, and had not observed the pothole at that time.

In order for liability to exist on the part of the respondent, it must be shown that the respondent had actual or constructive notice of the hazard which caused the damage. Davis vs. Dept. of Highways, 11 Ct. Cl. 150 (1976). No evidence of notice was presented in the record of this case;

therefore, negligence has not been established, and the claim must be denied.

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Department of Highways
11 Ct. Cl. 150 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Ct. Cl. 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/good-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1985.