Good Old Days Tavern, Inc. v. Zwirn

267 A.D.2d 147, 701 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13211
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Good Old Days Tavern, Inc. v. Zwirn. Read the opinion of the Court — 259 A.D.2d 300

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered July 7, 1999, which in an action for legal malpractice and fraud in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding, denied defendants’ motion for renewal of their previously denied motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly denied defendants’ motion to renew. Defendants’ argument, that this Court’s ruling that the individual plaintiff has standing to sue for legal malpractice (Good Old Days Tavern v Zwirn, 259 AD2d 300), requires dismissal of his claim for fraud and his Judiciary Law cause of action, is meritless. Plaintiff Days’ fraud and Judiciary Law claims are distinct and independent from his legal malpractice claim and his standing to sue for malpractice in no way precludes assertion of his other claims. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Good Old Days Tavern, Inc. v. Zwirn, 267 A.D.2d 147, 701 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 147 (Good Old Days Tavern, Inc. v. Zwirn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Good Old Days Tavern, Inc. v. Zwirn
259 A.D.2d 300 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)