Good Neighbors Or. Hill Protecting Prop. Rights v. Cnty. of Rockingham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Good Neighbors Or. Hill Protecting Prop. Rights v. Cnty. of Rockingham

778 S.E.2d 78

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 5, 2015

DocketNo. 298A15.

StatusPublished

This text of 778 S.E.2d 78 (Good Neighbors Or. Hill Protecting Prop. Rights v. Cnty. of Rockingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Good Neighbors Or. Hill Protecting Prop. Rights v. Cnty. of Rockingham, 778 S.E.2d 78 (N.C. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal in which there is a dissent from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 20th of August 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals.

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant on the 20th of August 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

*79"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal in which there is a dissent from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 20th of August 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals.

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant on the 20th of August 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

*79"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

778 S.E.2d 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/good-neighbors-or-hill-protecting-prop-rights-v-cnty-of-rockingham-nc-2015.