Good Life Productions, L. L. C. v. Down Town Ass'n

267 A.D.2d 153, 699 N.Y.S.2d 864, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13221

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered October 9, 1998, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s second, third and fourth causes of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Sufficient has been alleged as to promises collateral to the contract to support the fraud cause of action, which is duplicative of plaintiff’s breach of contract cause of action (see, Grauhard Mollen Dannett & Horowitz v Moskovitz, 86 NY2d 112, 122; cf., Big Apple Car v City of New York, 234 AD2d 136). We also agree with the motion court that plaintiff’s allegations were sufficient to state claims premised on estoppel theories (see, Rogers v Town of Islip, 230 AD2d 727). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Good Life Productions, L. L. C. v. Down Town Ass'n, 267 A.D.2d 153, 699 N.Y.S.2d 864, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 153 (Good Life Productions, L. L. C. v. Down Town Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Graubard Mollen Dannett & Horowitz v. Moskovitz
653 N.E.2d 1179 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Rogers v. Town of Islip
230 A.D.2d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Big Apple Car, Inc. v. City of New York
234 A.D.2d 136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)