Good Humor Corp. v. Round Hill Ice Cream Co.

Connecticut Superior Court

Good Humor Corp. v. Round Hill Ice Cream Co.

5 Conn. Supp. 149, 1937 Conn. Super. LEXIS 80

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJune 2, 1937

DocketFile #53297

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Conn. Supp. 149 (Good Humor Corp. v. Round Hill Ice Cream Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Good Humor Corp. v. Round Hill Ice Cream Co., 5 Conn. Supp. 149, 1937 Conn. Super. LEXIS 80 (Colo. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

DICKENSON, J.

The defendant deliberately tried to copy the plaintiff’s delivery trucks in color and design for the purpose of taking advantage of the good will the plaintiff had built up. The color scheme is the same, the symbol is prac' tically identical and the word “Home” adoptable to a pro' nunciation that would make it indistinguishable from “Hu' mor”.

[150]*150Judgment is directed for the plaintiff to the extent that the defendant is enjoined from selling or offering for sale ice cream by the use of vehicle or foot-peddlers bearing or carrying signs such as are now displayed upon the defendant’s truck, under a penalty of $5,000. damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DICKENSON, J.

The defendant deliberately tried to copy the plaintiff’s delivery trucks in color and design for the purpose of taking advantage of the good will the plaintiff had built up. The color scheme is the same, the symbol is prac' tically identical and the word “Home” adoptable to a pro' nunciation that would make it indistinguishable from “Hu' mor”.

[150]*150Judgment is directed for the plaintiff to the extent that the defendant is enjoined from selling or offering for sale ice cream by the use of vehicle or foot-peddlers bearing or carrying signs such as are now displayed upon the defendant’s truck, under a penalty of $5,000. damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Conn. Supp. 149, 1937 Conn. Super. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/good-humor-corp-v-round-hill-ice-cream-co-connsuperct-1937.