Gooch v. Hope

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Gooch v. Hope

1912 OK 34, 120 P. 653, 31 Okla. 173, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 27

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 9, 1912

Docket1255

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK 34 (Gooch v. Hope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gooch v. Hope, 1912 OK 34, 120 P. 653, 31 Okla. 173, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 27 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

DUNN, J.

This case presents error from the district court of Murray county, and is brought to this court to secure a reversal of the order thereof at chambers dissolving a temporary injunction. The evidence taken is not preserved by any valid bill of exceptions or case-made, the case being here on a transcript. The only questions raised are those going to errors alleged to have occurred on ■ the trial; it being contended on the part of plaintiffs in error that'on the evidence the trial court erred in the conclusion reached. . As the evidence is not before us, we could not determine the question sought to be presented by counsel.

Hence the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DUNN, J.

This case presents error from the district court of Murray county, and is brought to this court to secure a reversal of the order thereof at chambers dissolving a temporary injunction. The evidence taken is not preserved by any valid bill of exceptions or case-made, the case being here on a transcript. The only questions raised are those going to errors alleged to have occurred on ■ the trial; it being contended on the part of plaintiffs in error that'on the evidence the trial court erred in the conclusion reached. . As the evidence is not before us, we could not determine the question sought to be presented by counsel.

Hence the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK 34, 120 P. 653, 31 Okla. 173, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gooch-v-hope-okla-1912.