Goo v. Arakawa
This text of Goo v. Arakawa (Goo v. Arakawa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30142 05-DEC-2013 03:08 PM SCWC-30142
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
KAREN GOO, et al.,
Petitioners/Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants/Appellants/Cross-
Appellees,
vs.
MAYOR ALAN ARAKAWA, Successor-In-Interest to Mayor Charmaine
Tavares, WILLIAM SPENCE, Director of Planning, County of Maui,
Successor-In-Interest to Director Jeff Hunt, County of Maui
Respondents/Defendants/Cross-Claim Defendants/Appellees/Cross Appellants/Cross-Appellees,
and
VP AND PK(ML) LLC, KCOM Corp.,
Defendants/Intervenor-Defendants/Cross-Claim
Defendants/Counterclaimants/Cross-Claimants/Appellees/Cross Appellees/Cross-Appellants
KILA KILA CONSTRUCTION,
Defendant/Cross-Claim Defendant/Cross-Claimant
(John G.) JOHN G’S DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Defendant/Cross-Claimant/Cross-Claim Defendant
NEW SAND HILLS LLC.,
Defendant/Intervenor-Defendant/Counterclaimant/Cross-Claim
Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellee/Cross-Appellant
DAVID B. MERCHANT; JOYCE TAKAHASHI; BRIAN TAKAHASHI,
Defendants/Intervenor-Defendants
DIANE L. REASER, et al.,
Defendants/Intervenor-Defendants/Counter-Claimants
HOOKAHI, LLC, SANDHILLS ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,
Intervenors/Appellees/Cross-Appellees/Cross-Appellants
CHERYL CABEBE, GERRY RIOPTA, and MELISSA RIOPTA,
Intervenor-Defendants/Appellees/Cross-Appellants
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-30142; CIVIL NO. 07-1-0258(1))
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant/Appellant/
Cross-Appellee’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on
October 25, 2013, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, December 5, 2013.
David J. Gierlach and /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
Lance D. Collins,
for petitioners /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
Patrick K. Wong and /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
Caleb P. Rowe,
for respondents Mayor Alan /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Arakawa, et al.
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Ronald T. Yoshimoto and
Nathan H. Yoshimoto,
for respondents VP and PK(ML)
LLC, KCOM Corp., New Sand
Hills LLC., and Hookahi, LLC,
Sandhills Estates Community
Association
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Goo v. Arakawa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goo-v-arakawa-haw-2013.