Gonzalez v. WALGREENS

24 So. 3d 701, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19985, 2009 WL 4912616
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 22, 2009
Docket1D09-1464
StatusPublished

This text of 24 So. 3d 701 (Gonzalez v. WALGREENS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gonzalez v. WALGREENS, 24 So. 3d 701, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19985, 2009 WL 4912616 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellants’ response to this court’s October 29, 2009, order to show cause, we conclude the order being appealed is a non-appealable, non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1), Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Also, although not the basis of our decision, we note the order on appeal lacks any factual or legal findings, thereby rendering meaningful review nearly impossible.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

KAHN, LEWIS and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mintz v. Broward Correctional Institute
800 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 So. 3d 701, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19985, 2009 WL 4912616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-walgreens-fladistctapp-2009.