Gonzalez v. State
This text of 2016 ND 223 (Gonzalez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 12/5/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2016 ND 223
Garron William Gonzalez, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20160174
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Garron Gonzalez, self-represented, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, ND 58506, petitioner and appellant; on brief.
Julie A. Lawyer, Burleigh County Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck, ND 58501, for respondent and appellee; on brief.
Gonzalez v. State
[¶1] Garron Gonzalez appeals a district court order denying his motion for an order to show cause and dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Gonzalez applied for post-conviction relief arguing his prior post-conviction counsel was ineffective. Gonzalez argues the district court erred in summarily dismissing his application. Section 29-32.1-09(2), N.D.C.C., bars an applicant from claiming ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 ND 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-state-nd-2016.