Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Gonzalez v. State

Gonzalez v. State

753 So. 2d 644, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1990, 2000 WL 232761
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 1, 2000
DocketNo. 4D99-2086
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 753 So. 2d 644 (Gonzalez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gonzalez v. State, 753 So. 2d 644, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1990, 2000 WL 232761 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief only to the extent that the court denied appellant’s claim that his sentence is unconstitutional because the law which provided enhanced sentencing for violent career criminals, Ch. 95-182, §§ 1-7, 12, Laws of Fla., violated the single-subject rule. We remand for reconsideration in light of State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999). We affirm the trial court’s order in all other respects.

POLEN, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kitchen v. State
764 So. 2d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
State v. Frazier
753 So. 2d 644 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
753 So. 2d 644, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1990, 2000 WL 232761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.