Gonzalez v. State
352 So. 2d 944, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16872
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gonzalez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 384 So. 2d 57 →
Opinion
We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However we agree with appellant that there are imperfections in his sentence. The present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975), requires. Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Brooks v. State, supra. We remand the case for correction of sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gonzalez v. State, 352 So. 2d 944, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16872 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
352 So. 2d 944 (Gonzalez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brooks v. State
349 So. 2d 794 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)