Gonzalez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gonzalez v. State

114 So. 2d 628

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gonzalez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 So. 2d 127 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 3, 1959·No. No. 59-104·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been prosecuted in propria persona and in forma pauperis by the defendant, George Gonzalez, from a judgment and sentence for the crime of receiving stolen property. Gonzalez was regularly charged and he suffered a verdict of guilty after a jury trial.

The assignments of error are informal. Nevertheless, under the authority of section 924.32, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., we have reviewed the record in the light of all of the comments contained in the appellant’s brief. No reversible error appears. The judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Affirmed.

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CELAS., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been prosecuted in propria persona and in forma pauperis by the defendant, George Gonzalez, from a judgment and sentence for the crime of receiving stolen property. Gonzalez was regularly charged and he suffered a verdict of guilty after a jury trial.

The assignments of error are informal. Nevertheless, under the authority of section 924.32, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., we have reviewed the record in the light of all of the comments contained in the appellant’s brief. No reversible error appears. The judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Affirmed.

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CELAS., JJ., concur.

Gonzalez v. State, 114 So. 2d 628 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

114 So. 2d 628 (Gonzalez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.