Gonzalez v. State
769 So. 2d 1012, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 690, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1832, 2000 WL 1288904
Opinion
We have for review Gonzalez v. State, 742 So.2d 528 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) wherein the Third District Court of Appeal certified the following question as one of great public importance:
Whether chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, violates the single subject rule requirement contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.
We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
Consistent with our decisions in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), and Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000), we quash the district court’s decision and remand for resentencing in accordance with the sentencing guidelines in effect on March 12, 1996, the date of the offenses.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gonzalez v. State, 769 So. 2d 1012, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 690, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1832, 2000 WL 1288904 (Fla. 2000).
769 So. 2d 1012 (Gonzalez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. Co. v. Magaha
769 So. 2d 1012 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)