Gonzalez v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gonzalez v. Selsky

20 A.D.3d 833, 798 N.Y.S.2d 704, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8138

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 28, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 20 A.D.3d 833 (Gonzalez v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzalez v. Selsky, 20 A.D.3d 833, 798 N.Y.S.2d 704, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating temporary release rules and regulations. Inasmuch as the Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, the matter is moot and the petition is dismissed (see Matter of Alstranner v Selsky, 245 AD2d 922 [1997]).

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating temporary release rules and regulations. Inasmuch as the Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, the matter is moot and the petition is dismissed (see Matter of Alstranner v Selsky, 245 AD2d 922 [1997]).

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.3d 833, 798 N.Y.S.2d 704, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-selsky-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack