Gonzalez v. Scully

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gonzalez v. Scully

120 A.D.2d 666, 502 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56770

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.2d 666 (Gonzalez v. Scully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzalez v. Scully, 120 A.D.2d 666, 502 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion by the petitioner to amend his brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated March 18, 1985, to include reference to the recent Court of Appeals case of People ex rel. Roides v Smith (67 NY2d 899).

Motion granted and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties dated April 15, 1986, (1) the judgment is reversed on the authority of People ex rel. Roides v Smith (supra), (2) the determination made pursuant to a Superintendent’s proceeding hearing completed on July 27, 1984, is vacated and set aside, (3) the charges against the petitioner upon which said determination was based are dismissed, with prejudice, (4) all [667]*667entries concerning such charges, the Superintendent’s proceeding and the determination thereof, shall be expunged from the petitioner’s records, including but not limited to institutional and parole records, and (5) the petitioner is restored in all respects to the status he enjoyed prior to the commencement of the Superintendent’s proceeding. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Niehoff, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion by the petitioner to amend his brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated March 18, 1985, to include reference to the recent Court of Appeals case of People ex rel. Roides v Smith (67 NY2d 899).

Motion granted and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties dated April 15, 1986, (1) the judgment is reversed on the authority of People ex rel. Roides v Smith (supra), (2) the determination made pursuant to a Superintendent’s proceeding hearing completed on July 27, 1984, is vacated and set aside, (3) the charges against the petitioner upon which said determination was based are dismissed, with prejudice, (4) all [667]*667entries concerning such charges, the Superintendent’s proceeding and the determination thereof, shall be expunged from the petitioner’s records, including but not limited to institutional and parole records, and (5) the petitioner is restored in all respects to the status he enjoyed prior to the commencement of the Superintendent’s proceeding. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Niehoff, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.2d 666, 502 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-scully-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack