Gonzalez v. Prudential Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gonzalez v. Prudential Lines, Inc.

116 A.D.2d 542, 498 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51390

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 30, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 116 A.D.2d 542 (Gonzalez v. Prudential Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzalez v. Prudential Lines, Inc., 116 A.D.2d 542, 498 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), entered on April 6, 1984, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the issue of [543]*543damages only, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and the motion for a new trial on the issue of damages is granted unless defendant, within 20 days after service upon its attorney of a copy of the order herein, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to an increase of the verdict in plaintiffs favor to $150,000 and to the entry of a judgment in accordance therewith. If defendant so stipulates, the order appealed from is unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be inadequate to the extent indicated. Concur&emdash;Sandler, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), entered on April 6, 1984, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the issue of [543]*543damages only, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and the motion for a new trial on the issue of damages is granted unless defendant, within 20 days after service upon its attorney of a copy of the order herein, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to an increase of the verdict in plaintiffs favor to $150,000 and to the entry of a judgment in accordance therewith. If defendant so stipulates, the order appealed from is unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be inadequate to the extent indicated. Concur&emdash;Sandler, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 A.D.2d 542, 498 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-prudential-lines-inc-nyappdiv-1986.