Gonzalez v. Northwings Accessories Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gonzalez v. Northwings Accessories Corp.

188 So. 3d 81, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4884, 2016 WL 1235762

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 30, 2016

DocketNo. 3D15-84

StatusPublished

This text of 188 So. 3d 81 (Gonzalez v. Northwings Accessories Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzalez v. Northwings Accessories Corp., 188 So. 3d 81, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4884, 2016 WL 1235762 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Eladio Gonzalez alleges a wrongful retaliatory termination of his employment by Appellee Northwings Accessories Corporation. The trial court granted summary judgment to Northwings as to Mr. Gonzalez’s claims under both the Florida Whistleblower Act and the Florida Civil Rights Act. Based on the record before us, we conclude that the trial court properly determined that Mr. Gonzalez cannot establish that: (i) the grounds for his termination were causally linked to protected activity under these two statutes; and (ii) his employer evidenced a pretextual reason for his termination.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Eladio Gonzalez alleges a wrongful retaliatory termination of his employment by Appellee Northwings Accessories Corporation. The trial court granted summary judgment to Northwings as to Mr. Gonzalez’s claims under both the Florida Whistleblower Act and the Florida Civil Rights Act. Based on the record before us, we conclude that the trial court properly determined that Mr. Gonzalez cannot establish that: (i) the grounds for his termination were causally linked to protected activity under these two statutes; and (ii) his employer evidenced a pretextual reason for his termination.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 So. 3d 81, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4884, 2016 WL 1235762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-northwings-accessories-corp-fladistctapp-2016.