Gonzalez v. Moriyon

553 So. 2d 249, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2705, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6447, 1989 WL 139515
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 21, 1989
DocketNo. 89-1699
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 553 So. 2d 249 (Gonzalez v. Moriyon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gonzalez v. Moriyon, 553 So. 2d 249, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2705, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6447, 1989 WL 139515 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(b) states that if a party has filed or served any paper in an action, that party is entitled to notice of the opposing party’s application for default. In this case, appellant/defendant had filed a motion to dismiss the action; thus, appellee/plaintiff’s failure to produce a certificate showing proof that he notified appellant of his application for a default judgment, Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.080(f), is grounds to vacate the trial court’s order granting default. Carson v. Lee, 450 So.2d 930 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Kiaer v. Friendship, Inc., 376 So.2d 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clearvalle, Inc. v. Cohen
561 So. 2d 1354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
553 So. 2d 249, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2705, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6447, 1989 WL 139515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-moriyon-fladistctapp-1989.