Gonzalez v. Moreno

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gonzalez v. Moreno

360 So. 2d 1301, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16335

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 25, 1978

DocketNo. 77-2292

StatusPublished

This text of 360 So. 2d 1301 (Gonzalez v. Moreno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzalez v. Moreno, 360 So. 2d 1301, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16335 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals a summary final judgment for the defendant in an automobile negligence case. Plaintiff was a passenger in defendant’s automobile. The summary judgment for the driver was, proper because the deposition and answers to interrogatories conclusively showed that the collision was caused by another driver who ran a red light. Plaintiff came forward with no evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact. Cf. Byrd v. Leach, 226 So.2d 866 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals a summary final judgment for the defendant in an automobile negligence case. Plaintiff was a passenger in defendant’s automobile. The summary judgment for the driver was, proper because the deposition and answers to interrogatories conclusively showed that the collision was caused by another driver who ran a red light. Plaintiff came forward with no evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact. Cf. Byrd v. Leach, 226 So.2d 866 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

360 So. 2d 1301, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-moreno-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack