Gonzalez v. Mel Bernie and Company, Inc.

S.D. New York

Gonzalez v. Mel Bernie and Company, Inc.

DecidedApril 9, 2024

Docket1:23-cv-09331

StatusUnknown

This text of Gonzalez v. Mel Bernie and Company, Inc. (Gonzalez v. Mel Bernie and Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzalez v. Mel Bernie and Company, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: cane ccna nanan sana nnnnana DATE FILED: __4/9/24 YANILZA GONZALEZ, : Plaintiff, : : 23-cv-9331 (LJL) -v- : : ORDER MEL BERNIE & Co. : Defendant. : wee KX LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for a thirty-day extension of time to file a conditional dismissal order. Dkt. No. 11. Pursuant to this Court’s order on February 18, 2024, see Dkt. No. 10, the action has been dismissed. Accordingly, the motion for an extension is denied without prejudice to renewal by formal motion to reopen the case. See S.D.N.Y. Local Rules 6.1; 7.1; see also Midwest Realty Memt. Co. v. City of Beavercreek, 93 F. App’x 782 (6th Cir. 2004) (per curiam); U.S. ex rel. Knight v. Reliant Hospice, Inc., 2011 WL 1321584, at *2 (D.S.C. Apr. 4, 2011). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. No. 11.

SO ORDERED. iS Dated: April 9, 2024 wt MU New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: cane ccna nanan sana nnnnana DATE FILED: __4/9/24 YANILZA GONZALEZ, : Plaintiff, : : 23-cv-9331 (LJL) -v- : : ORDER MEL BERNIE & Co. : Defendant. : wee KX LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for a thirty-day extension of time to file a conditional dismissal order. Dkt. No. 11. Pursuant to this Court’s order on February 18, 2024, see Dkt. No. 10, the action has been dismissed. Accordingly, the motion for an extension is denied without prejudice to renewal by formal motion to reopen the case. See S.D.N.Y. Local Rules 6.1; 7.1; see also Midwest Realty Memt. Co. v. City of Beavercreek, 93 F. App’x 782 (6th Cir. 2004) (per curiam); U.S. ex rel. Knight v. Reliant Hospice, Inc., 2011 WL 1321584, at *2 (D.S.C. Apr. 4, 2011). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. No. 11.

SO ORDERED. iS Dated: April 9, 2024 wt MU New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Gonzalez v. Mel Bernie and Company, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-mel-bernie-and-company-inc-nysd-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack