Gonzalez v. JAG Trucking, Inc.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEONEL GONZALEZ and JONATHAN Case No. 1:18-cv-01046 LJO JLT BASULTO, 12 ORDER CLOSING THE CASE AS TO Plaintiffs, CROSS-DEFENDANT LEAH ALVARADO 13 (Doc. 129) vs. 14 JAG TRUCKING, INC. et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ____________________________________
17 AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS
18 19 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice as to Leah 20 Alvarado. (Doc. 129) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations 21 effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have appeared in 22 the action signed the stipulation. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 23 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the action as to cross-defendant Lean 24 Alvarado. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26
27 Dated: June 30, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gonzalez v. JAG Trucking, Inc. (Gonzalez v. JAG Trucking, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.