Gonzalez v. Gonzalez

481 So. 2d 1316, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6205
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gonzalez v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 446 So. 2d 237
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 4, 1986·No. No. 85-1351·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1202-03 (Fla.1980); Faircloth v. Faircloth, 339 So.2d 650 (Fla.1976); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla.1976); Edwards v. Pratt, 335 So.2d 597, 598 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Chappell v, Chappell, 253 So.2d 281 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gonzalez v. Gonzalez, 481 So. 2d 1316, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6205 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

481 So. 2d 1316 (Gonzalez v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Edwards v. Pratt
335 So. 2d 597 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Shaw v. Shaw
334 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Faircloth v. Faircloth
339 So. 2d 650 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Chappell v. Chappell
253 So. 2d 281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)