Gonzalez v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gonzalez v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

230 So. 2d 196

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 13, 1970

DocketNo. 69-438

StatusPublished

This text of 230 So. 2d 196 (Gonzalez v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzalez v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp., 230 So. 2d 196 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reversed a summary final judgment in this case and remanded it for trial in Gonzalez v. General Accident Fire and Life Assur. Corp., Fla.App.1969, 216 So.2d 797. Many of the pertinent facts, dates and issues to be tried on remand were set forth therein.

After a non-jury trial the judge entered a final judgment for garnishee and found that the garnishee (insurance company) had properly imposed the surcharge in question; had followed the applicable cancellation procedure; had not waived the cancellation of the policy and that the garnishor (Gonzalez) had failed to prove his case in fact or law, accordingly, he ordered the writ of garnishment dissolved.

Gonzalez, by this appeal, argues that the trial court erred in failing to enter a final judgment in his favor and in entering a final judgment for the insurance company.

We have reviewed the conflicting testimony and evidence and find substantial and competent evidence to support the findings of fact and the conclusions of law based on these findings. See Peacock v. Peacock, Fla.App.1968, 207 So.2d 292.

The final judgment herein appealed is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI