Gonzalez v. Flushing Hospital Medical Center

245 A.D.2d 543, 666 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13349
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 29, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 245 A.D.2d 543 (Gonzalez v. Flushing Hospital Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gonzalez v. Flushing Hospital Medical Center, 245 A.D.2d 543, 666 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13349 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Flushing Hospital Medical Center appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Patterson, J.), dated August 22, 1997, as denied its motion to change venue from Kings County to Queens County, and denied that branch of the cross motion of the defendants Alan Barry Nerenberg, M.D., and John Joseph Pellettieri, M.D., in which it joined, which was to require the plaintiff to post security for costs pursuant to CPLR 8501 (a).

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which denied that branch of the cross motion of the defendants Alan Barry Nerenberg, M.D., and John Joseph Pellettieri, M.D., in which the appellant Flushing Hospital Medical Center joined, which was to require the plaintiff to post security for costs pursuant to CPLR 8501 (a) and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the cross motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a determination of the amount of security for costs which should be posted.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion to change venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) (see, O’Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 AD2d 169). However, as she is not a resident of this State, the plaintiff must furnish security for costs in compliance with CPLR 8501 (a) (see, Scharaga v Schwartzberg, 149 AD2d 578, 580). Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman, Krausman and Lerner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yarwood v. County of Suffolk
2019 NY Slip Op 6017 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Small v. Stern
65 A.D.3d 1326 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Verdino v. Alexandrou
253 A.D.2d 553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 A.D.2d 543, 666 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-flushing-hospital-medical-center-nyappdiv-1997.