Gonzalez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gonzalez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

752 So. 2d 726, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2791, 2000 WL 276469

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 15, 2000

DocketNo. 3D99-2339

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 752 So. 2d 726 (Gonzalez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzalez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 752 So. 2d 726, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2791, 2000 WL 276469 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rolando Gonzalez appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming the referee’s denial of unemployment benefits. We reverse.

The record reveals that Gonzalez’ actions amounted to “the mere exercise of poor judgment [that] does not amount to misconduct sufficient to support the denial of unemployment compensation benefits.” Navarrete v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 726 So.2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). See, e.g., Baptiste v. Waste Management, Inc., 701 So.2d 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., Inc., 637 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). We state again that misconduct serious enough to justify dismissal is not always sufficient to support forfeiture of benefits.

Reversed and remanded with directions to grant claimant benefits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rolando Gonzalez appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming the referee’s denial of unemployment benefits. We reverse.

The record reveals that Gonzalez’ actions amounted to “the mere exercise of poor judgment [that] does not amount to misconduct sufficient to support the denial of unemployment compensation benefits.” Navarrete v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 726 So.2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). See, e.g., Baptiste v. Waste Management, Inc., 701 So.2d 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., Inc., 637 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). We state again that misconduct serious enough to justify dismissal is not always sufficient to support forfeiture of benefits.

Reversed and remanded with directions to grant claimant benefits.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

752 So. 2d 726, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2791, 2000 WL 276469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack