Gonzalez v. Felson

244 A.D.2d 525, 665 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11852
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 24, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.), entered October 17, 1996, which, upon a jury verdict finding the defendants 100% at fault in the happening of the accident, awarded the plaintiff $860,000 ($250,000 for past pain and suffering, $450,000 for future pain and suffering, $130,000 for future lost earnings, and $30,000 for future medical expenses).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ request for a missing-witness charge (see, PJI 1:75) since the testimony of the two doctors would have been merely cumulative (see, Kane v Linsky, 156 AD2d 333, 334; Levande v Dines, 153 AD2d 671, 672; Getlin v St. Vincent’s Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 117 AD2d 707, 708).

Contrary to the defendants’ assertions on appeal, the damage award did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]).

The defendants’ remaining contention is without merit. Copertino, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gonzalez v. Felson, 244 A.D.2d 525, 665 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 525 (Gonzalez v. Felson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Komforti v. New York City Transit Authority
292 A.D.2d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)