Gonzalez v. FCI Berlin, Warden

District Court, D. New Hampshire·Decided March 27, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-00085·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

David Gonzalez

v. Case No. 23-CV-85-SE

FCI Berlin, Warden

ORDER

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated January 24, 2024. For the reasons explained therein, the Warden’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 6) is granted, and the Petitioner’s Motion for Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 10) is denied. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

____________________________ Samantha D. Elliott United States District Judge

Date: March 27, 2024

cc: David Gonzalez, pro se Counsel of record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gonzalez v. FCI Berlin, Warden, (D.N.H. 2024).

Gonzalez v. FCI Berlin, Warden (Gonzalez v. FCI Berlin, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related