Gonzalez v. FCI Berlin, Warden
This text of Gonzalez v. FCI Berlin, Warden (Gonzalez v. FCI Berlin, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
David Gonzalez
v. Case No. 23-CV-85-SE
FCI Berlin, Warden
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated January 24, 2024. For the reasons explained therein, the Warden’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 6) is granted, and the Petitioner’s Motion for Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 10) is denied. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
____________________________ Samantha D. Elliott United States District Judge
Date: March 27, 2024
cc: David Gonzalez, pro se Counsel of record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gonzalez v. FCI Berlin, Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-fci-berlin-warden-nhd-2024.