Gonzalez v. Dar-Je, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gonzalez v. Dar-Je, Inc.

771 So. 2d 624, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15186, 2000 WL 1741127

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 22, 2000

DocketNo. 3D00-1715

StatusPublished

This text of 771 So. 2d 624 (Gonzalez v. Dar-Je, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzalez v. Dar-Je, Inc., 771 So. 2d 624, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15186, 2000 WL 1741127 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Frescia Gonzalez appeals the denial of unemployment compensation benefits. In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the referee to resolve the conflicts in the evidence. See Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., Inc., 618 So.2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). The referee ruled in favor [625]*625of the appellee. This court is not allowed to overturn the referee’s factual findings, as long as there was competent, substantial evidence at the hearing which supports the findings. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). As we see no legal basis on which to disturb the referee’s findings, the order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Frescia Gonzalez appeals the denial of unemployment compensation benefits. In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the referee to resolve the conflicts in the evidence. See Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., Inc., 618 So.2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). The referee ruled in favor [625]*625of the appellee. This court is not allowed to overturn the referee’s factual findings, as long as there was competent, substantial evidence at the hearing which supports the findings. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). As we see no legal basis on which to disturb the referee’s findings, the order is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

771 So. 2d 624, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15186, 2000 WL 1741127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-dar-je-inc-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack