Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Correction

4 A.3d 1226, 298 Conn. 918, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 363
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 22, 2010·No. SC 18688·Published

Opinion

The petition by the respondent for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 122 Conn. App. 705 (AC 29686), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[919]*919The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18688. MichaelE. O’Hare, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Robert J. McKay, special public defender, in opposition. Decided September 22, 2010
“1. Whether the Appellate Court properly ruled that the sixth amendment confers a right to the effective assistance of counsel in matters pertaining to credit for presentence confinement?
“2. Whether the Appellate Court properly ruled that the petitioner met his burden of showing deficient performance and prejudice within the meaning of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984)?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Correction, 4 A.3d 1226, 298 Conn. 918, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 363 (Colo. 2010).

4 A.3d 1226 (Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Correction
1 A.3d 170 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)