Gonzalez v. City of Yonkers

277 A.D.2d 421, 716 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12276
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 27, 2000·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated September 29, 1999, which granted the motion of the defendant City of Yonkers for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Even if the left-turn traffic signal at the intersection at issue was not operational at the time of the accident, the status of the signal was not a proximate cause of the accident (see, Rubinfeld v City of New York, 263 AD2d 448). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gonzalez v. City of Yonkers, 277 A.D.2d 421, 716 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

277 A.D.2d 421 (Gonzalez v. City of Yonkers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Regan v. City of New York
127 A.D.3d 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Achaibar v. City of New York
45 Misc. 3d 1036 (New York Supreme Court, 2014)
Alvarez v. Hee Youn Koo
16 A.D.3d 442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Bisceglia v. International Business Machines
287 A.D.2d 674 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)