Gonzalez v. City of Peekskill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gonzalez v. City of Peekskill

284 A.D.2d 463, 726 N.Y.S.2d 874, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6360

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 284 A.D.2d 463 (Gonzalez v. City of Peekskill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzalez v. City of Peekskill, 284 A.D.2d 463, 726 N.Y.S.2d 874, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6360 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated August 4, 2000, which, inter alia, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Since the petitioner was not a party to either the collective bargaining agreement or the arbitration, he lacks standing to seek vacatur of the arbitrator’s award (see, CPLR 7511; Matter of Wilson v Board of Educ., 261 AD2d 409; Matter of Alava v Consolidated Edison Co., 183 AD2d 713).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated August 4, 2000, which, inter alia, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Since the petitioner was not a party to either the collective bargaining agreement or the arbitration, he lacks standing to seek vacatur of the arbitrator’s award (see, CPLR 7511; Matter of Wilson v Board of Educ., 261 AD2d 409; Matter of Alava v Consolidated Edison Co., 183 AD2d 713).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 463, 726 N.Y.S.2d 874, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-city-of-peekskill-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack