Gonzalez v. City of New York
100 A.D.2d 952, 475 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18095
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gonzalez v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 A.D.2d 666 →
Opinion
Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fuchs, J.), dated December 28, 1982, affirmed, with costs. (See Pierson v City of New York, 56 NY2d 950.) Thompson, J. P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gonzalez v. City of New York, 100 A.D.2d 952, 475 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18095 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
100 A.D.2d 952 (Gonzalez v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pierson v. City of New York
439 N.E.2d 331 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)