Gonzalez v. Chicago
373 U.S. 542, 83 S. Ct. 1538
This text of 373 U.S. 542 (Gonzalez v. Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gonzalez v. Chicago, 373 U.S. 542, 83 S. Ct. 1538 (1963).
Opinion
GONZALEZ ET AL.
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO.
Supreme Court of United States.
Frederic D. Houghteling, George W. Overton, F. Raymond Marks, Jr. and Donald Page Moore for appellants.
John C. Melaniphy, Milton P. Webster, Jr. and Albert E. Jenner, Jr. for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Chicago v. Gorham
400 N.E.2d 42 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1980)
Milne v. Rhode Island
373 U.S. 542 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
373 U.S. 542, 83 S. Ct. 1538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-chicago-scotus-1963.