Gonzalez v. Bi-State Medical Consultants, Inc.
271 S.W.3d 636, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1700, 2008 WL 5454214
Opinion
ORDER
This is an appeal from the entry of summary judgment. No error of law appears. ITT Commercial Finance v. Mid-Am. Marine, 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for them information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gonzalez v. Bi-State Medical Consultants, Inc., 271 S.W.3d 636, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1700, 2008 WL 5454214 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
271 S.W.3d 636 (Gonzalez v. Bi-State Medical Consultants, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
BAERG v. State
271 S.W.3d 636 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)