Gonzalez v. Beard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Gonzalez v. Beard

961 A.2d 55

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 24, 2008·No. 473 MAL 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of November, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is dismissed as improvident. See Pa. R.A.P. 1101 (the correct means to perfect an appeal from a matter originally commenced in the Commonwealth Court is to file a notice of appeal in accordance with the rules regarding appeals from lower courts); Pa.R.A.P. 908(a) (a notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days after entry of the order being appealed). The Application for Relief is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of November, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is dismissed as improvident. See Pa. R.A.P. 1101 (the correct means to perfect an appeal from a matter originally commenced in the Commonwealth Court is to file a notice of appeal in accordance with the rules regarding appeals from lower courts); Pa.R.A.P. 908(a) (a notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days after entry of the order being appealed). The Application for Relief is denied as moot.

Gonzalez v. Beard, 961 A.2d 55 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

961 A.2d 55 (Gonzalez v. Beard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.