Gonzalez v. Bath Iron Works
545 N.E.2d 634, 74 N.Y.2d 839, 546 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2934
This text of 545 N.E.2d 634 (Gonzalez v. Bath Iron Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gonzalez v. Bath Iron Works, 545 N.E.2d 634, 74 N.Y.2d 839, 546 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2934 (N.Y. 1989).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely. Recent legislation (L 1989, ch 461) authorizing fax service, effective January 1, 1990, has not been considered with respect to the fax service here involved.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
545 N.E.2d 634, 74 N.Y.2d 839, 546 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-bath-iron-works-ny-1989.