Gonzalez v. American Heritage Life Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gonzalez v. American Heritage Life Insurance Co.

747 So. 2d 991, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15641, 1999 WL 1062666

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 24, 1999

DocketNo. 99-0939

StatusPublished

This text of 747 So. 2d 991 (Gonzalez v. American Heritage Life Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzalez v. American Heritage Life Insurance Co., 747 So. 2d 991, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15641, 1999 WL 1062666 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the decedent was bound by the contents of the insurance application he signed, see Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. Bratton, 351 So.2d 344, 347-48 (Fla.1977); Florida Automobile Finance Corporation v. Reyes, 710 So.2d 216, 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and that, under the circumstances, the appellee insurer was entitled to rescind the insurance policy. See Continental Assurance Co. v. Carroll, 485 So.2d 406, 409 (Fla.1986); Smart v. Time Insurance Co., 419 So.2d 686, 686-87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

We also affirm with respect to the appellant widow’s claim that the appellee has not properly refunded the insurance premium of $3141.85. This life insurance policy was purchased through First Union National Bank of Florida, as agent for the appellee insurer. The record indicates that the portion of the premium which went to the appellee insurance company, together with the commission which went to First Union, in the total amount of $3141.85 was credited by First Union to the appellant’s loan account. Whether First Union was allowed under the loan documents to credit the premium refund against the loan account, as opposed to returning the entire premium to the appellant borrower, is a question not now before us, and First Union is not a party to the present appeal. Our affirmance as to the appellee insurance company is without prejudice to the appellant to pursue the point with First Union.

The summary judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the decedent was bound by the contents of the insurance application he signed, see Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. Bratton, 351 So.2d 344, 347-48 (Fla.1977); Florida Automobile Finance Corporation v. Reyes, 710 So.2d 216, 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and that, under the circumstances, the appellee insurer was entitled to rescind the insurance policy. See Continental Assurance Co. v. Carroll, 485 So.2d 406, 409 (Fla.1986); Smart v. Time Insurance Co., 419 So.2d 686, 686-87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

We also affirm with respect to the appellant widow’s claim that the appellee has not properly refunded the insurance premium of $3141.85. This life insurance policy was purchased through First Union National Bank of Florida, as agent for the appellee insurer. The record indicates that the portion of the premium which went to the appellee insurance company, together with the commission which went to First Union, in the total amount of $3141.85 was credited by First Union to the appellant’s loan account. Whether First Union was allowed under the loan documents to credit the premium refund against the loan account, as opposed to returning the entire premium to the appellant borrower, is a question not now before us, and First Union is not a party to the present appeal. Our affirmance as to the appellee insurance company is without prejudice to the appellant to pursue the point with First Union.

The summary judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

747 So. 2d 991, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15641, 1999 WL 1062666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-american-heritage-life-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack