Gonzalez v. Amazon.com Services LLC

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedMarch 13, 2025
Docket1:24-cv-00325
StatusUnknown

This text of Gonzalez v. Amazon.com Services LLC (Gonzalez v. Amazon.com Services LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gonzalez v. Amazon.com Services LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 Douglas E. Dexter (State Bar No. 115868) ddexter@fbm.com 2 Jaya B. Narang (State Bar No. 317909) jbnarang@fbm.com 3 Jacqueline M. Gerson (State Bar No. 351165) jgerson@fbm.com 4 Farella Braun + Martel LLP One Bush Street, Suite 900 5 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4400 6 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480

7 Attorneys for Defendant AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC 8

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO FRESNO DIVISION 12 13 CASSANDRA GONZALEZ, an individual, Case No. 1:24-cv-00325-KES-CDB

14 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER AS MODIFIED 15 vs. AT PAR. 6.3

16 AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, a Hon. Kirk E. Sherriff Delaware Limited Liability Company; and 17 DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Complaint Filed: February 13, 2024 Trial Date: January 27, 2026 18 Defendant.

19 20 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 22 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 23 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 24 Accordingly, Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC (“Amazon” or “Defendant”) and Plaintiff 25 Cassandra Gonzalez (“Plaintiff”) (collectively, “the parties”), by and through their counsel of 26 record, hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. 27 As detailed in Paragraph 3, this Protective Order will provide protection for materials in 1 records, employees’ personnel records, and documents reflecting disciplinary action taken towards 2 employees. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 3 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and 4 use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 5 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, 6 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 7 under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards 8 that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 9 2. DEFINITIONS 10 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 11 information or items under this Order. 12 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 13 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 14 of Civil Procedure 26(c). 15 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as 16 well as their support staff). 17 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 18 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 19 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 20 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 21 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 22 responses to discovery in this matter. 23 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 24 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 25 consultant in this action. 26 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 27 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 1 entity not named as a Party to this action. 2 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 3 action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action 4 on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 5 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 6 consultants, retained experts and investigators, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support 7 staffs). 8 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 9 Material in this action. 10 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 11 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 12 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 13 subcontractors. 14 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 15 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 16 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 17 Producing Party. 18 3. SCOPE 19 The types of information eligible for protection under this Stipulation and Order include 20 but are not limited to the following: Plaintiff’s medical records, third party personnel records, and 21 Amazon’s internal communications and documents. Courts have routinely recognized a legally 22 cognizable privacy interest in records of this nature. See e.g., Doe v. A. J. Boggs & Co., No. 23 118CV01464AWIBAM, 2019 WL 1517567, at *6 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2019) (citing Pettus v. Cole, 24 49 Cal. App. 4th 402, 440 (1996)) (ordering discovery of Plaintiffs’ medical information as 25 subject to protective order because “California law recognizes a constitutional right to privacy in 26 an individual’s medical history”); Buchanan v. Santos, No. 1:08-CV-01174-AWI, 2011 WL 27 2112475, at *5 (E.D. Cal. May 26, 2011) (ordering discovery of personnel records as subject to 1 2020 WL 3542328, at *5 (E.D. Cal. June 30, 2020) (ordering discovery of personnel records as 2 subject to protective order). 3 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 4 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) 5 all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 6 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 7 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 8 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a 9 Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a 10 result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public 11 record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to 12 the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained 13 the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any 14 use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 15 4. DURATION 16 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 17 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 18 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims 19 and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the 20 completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 21 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to 22 applicable law. 23 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 24 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pettus v. Cole
49 Cal. App. 4th 402 (California Court of Appeal, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gonzalez v. Amazon.com Services LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-v-amazoncom-services-llc-caed-2025.