Gonzalez, Ricardo v
This text of Gonzalez, Ricardo v (Gonzalez, Ricardo v) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-92,612 -01, -02, and -03
EX PARTE RICARDO V GONZALEZ, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 19584A, 19582A, AND 23078A IN THE 356TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARDIN COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant filed these applications for writs of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and
the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07. The State
charged Applicant with aggravated assault (the -01) and possessing cocaine (the -02). Under plea
agreements, Applicant pled guilty for deferred adjudication probation. During the probation period,
the State charged Applicant with possessing with intent to deliver cocaine (the -03). Under a plea
agreement, Applicant pled guilty to the new offense for an 18-year sentence. He pled true in his other
cases to probation-revocation motions, which were based on the new offense, for 16 and 8 year
sentences. Another pending case was also dismissed. Applicant appealed a pre-trial suppression
issue in the new offense. The appellate court affirmed, and there was no PDR. See Gonzalez v. 2
State, Nos. 09-15-00257-CR, 09-15-00258, and 09-15-00259-CR (Tex. App.—Beaumont Feb. 15,
2017). These are the first habeas applications. They raise the same claims alleging ineffective
assistance of counsel.
The trial court entered orders designating issues in each case and ordered trial counsel to
provide an affidavit. Trial counsel has provided an affidavit. The habeas record, however, has no
findings from the trial court that make credibility determinations or resolve the disputed factual
issues. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: May 26, 2021
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gonzalez, Ricardo v, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-ricardo-v-texcrimapp-2021.