Gonzalez Mondragon v. R.T. Farm Labor, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedMay 22, 2024
Docket1:22-cv-01259
StatusUnknown

This text of Gonzalez Mondragon v. R.T. Farm Labor, Inc. (Gonzalez Mondragon v. R.T. Farm Labor, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gonzalez Mondragon v. R.T. Farm Labor, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

1 STAN S. MALLISON (SBN 184191) StanM@TheMMLawFirm.com 2 HECTOR R. MARTINEZ (SBN 206336) HectorM@TheMMLawFirm.com 3 GONZALO QUEZADA (SBN 338386) GQuezada@TheMMLawFirm.com 4 MALLISON & MARTINEZ 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 730 5 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 832-9999 6 Facsimile: (510) 832-1101

7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs CLAUDIA GONZALEZ MONDRAGON, 8 GUSTAVO GUSMAN, and ALAN REYES

9 Rissa A. Stuart - # 166459 10 Hunter W. Swearingen - # 339788 Sarjun S. Bal - # 350735 11 KAHN, SOARES & CONWAY, LLP 219 North Douty Street 12 Hanford, California 93230 Telephone: (559) 584-337 13 Fax: (559) 584-3348 14 Attorney for Defendant T&C VINEYARDS

15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 CLAUDIA GONZALEZ MONDRAGON, Case No. 1:22-cv-01259-JLT-BAM GUSTAVO GUSMAN, and ALAN REYES 19 on behalf of themselves and those similarly JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY situated, OF PROTECTIVE ORDER 20 REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL Plaintiffs, DOCUMENTS; PROTECTIVE 21 ORDER v. 22 R T FARM LABOR, INC, a California Complaint Filed: October 3, 2023 23 Corporation, T&C VINEYARDS, an FAC Filed: September 8, 2023 unknown business entity, RICARDO Trail Date: None Set 24 TREVINO JR., an individual, RICARDO GOMEZ TREVINO, an individual, HAROLD 25 CHUHLANTSEFF, an individual, and DOES 1-50 26 Defendants. 27

28 _______________________________________ 1 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2 The Parties, Plaintiffs Claudia Gonzalez Mondragon, Gustavo Gusman, Alan Reyes and the 3 putative class they seek to represent (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant T&C Vineyards 4 (“Defendant”) (together, the “Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby 5 stipulate for the purpose of jointly requesting that the honorable Court enter a Protective Order 6 regarding confidential documents in this matter, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, 7, and 26, as well as 7 U.S. Dist. Ct., E.D. Cal. L.R. 141, 141.1, 143, and 251. The Parties agree as follows: 8 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 9 This action (Claudia Gonzalez Mondragon, et. al. v. R T Farm Labor, Inc., et. al. [1:22-cv- 10 01259-JLT-BAM]) is likely to involve and disclose private/personal information, including but not 11 limited to, Plaintiff’s and putative class members’ personnel records (including wage information, 12 personal identifying information), contact information and further potential personal identifying 13 information and confidential business information and/or proprietary information of Defendant such 14 as Defendant’s employment and business manuals, agreements, record keeping, commercial 15 information, financial information and internal processes, for which special protection from public 16 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such 17 confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential 18 business or financial information, information regarding confidential business practices, or other 19 confidential research, development, or commercial information (including information implicating 20 privacy rights of third parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which 21 may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, 22 case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, in light of the nature of the claims and allegations in 23 this case and the Parties’ representations that discovery in this case will involve the production of 24 confidential records, and in order to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 25 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information 26 the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable 27 necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their 28 handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such 1 information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be

2 designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith 3 belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why 4 it should not be part of the public record of this case. 5 DEFINITIONS 6 1. The term “confidential information” will mean and include information contained or 7 disclosed in any materials, including documents, portions of documents, answers to interrogatories 8 and requests for admissions, trial testimony, deposition testimony, and transcripts of trial testimony 9 and depositions, including data, summaries, and compilations derived therefrom that is deemed to be 10 confidential information by any party to which it belongs, because the designating party reasonably 11 believes (1) it constitutes proprietary information, confidential business information, confidential 12 financial information, or documents and/or trade secrets relating to its business, and/or confidential 13 personal information in which the party or third parties have a protectable interest, and (2) to be 14 subject to protection from disclosure under applicable law. 15 2. The term “materials” will include, but is not be limited to: documents; 16 correspondence; memoranda; bulletins; blueprints; specifications; customer lists or other material 17 that identify customers or potential customers; price lists or schedules or other matter identifying 18 pricing; minutes; telegrams; letters; statements; cancelled checks; contracts; invoices; drafts; books 19 of account; worksheets; notes of conversations; desk diaries; appointment books; expense accounts; 20 recordings; photographs; motion pictures; compilations from which information can be obtained and 21 translated into reasonably usable form through detection devices; sketches; drawings; notes 22 (including laboratory notebooks and records); reports; instructions; disclosures; other writings; 23 models, prototypes, and other physical objects. 24 3. The term “counsel” will mean outside counsel of record, and other attorneys, 25 including paralegals, secretaries, and other support staff employed in the law firms identified below: 26 • Mallison and Martinez, LLP (for Plaintiffs Claudia Gonzalez Mondragon, 27 Gustavo Gusman, Alan Reyes and the putative class) 28 1 • Kahn, Soares, & Conway, LLP (for Defendant T&C Vineyards, a California

2 General Partnership) 3 4. The term “Parties” shall collectively be defined as, and individually each be referred 4 to as a “party,” and include Plaintiffs Claudia Gonzalez Mondragon, Gustavo Gusman, Alan Reyes 5 and the putative class he seeks to represent and Defendant T&C Vineyards. 6 GENERAL RULES 7 5. Each party to this litigation that produces or discloses any materials, answers to 8 interrogatories and requests for admission, trial testimony, deposition testimony, and transcripts of 9 trial testimony and depositions, or information that the producing party believes should be subject to 10 this Order may designate the same as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 11 a. Designation as “CONFIDENTIAL”: A party or non-party subject to this 12 Order may only designate documents or other information in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” if 13 the designating party or non-party has an articulable, good faith basis to believe that each document 14 or other information designated as confidential qualifies for protection under Federal Rule of Civil 15 Procedure 26(c). 16 6. Whenever a deposition taken on behalf of any party involves a disclosure of 17 confidential information of any party: 18 a.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gonzalez Mondragon v. R.T. Farm Labor, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-mondragon-v-rt-farm-labor-inc-caed-2024.