GONZALEZ, MICHAEL v. SHERIFF, WAYNE COUNTY
This text of GONZALEZ, MICHAEL v. SHERIFF, WAYNE COUNTY (GONZALEZ, MICHAEL v. SHERIFF, WAYNE COUNTY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
837 KAH 11-01670 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. MICHAEL GONZALEZ, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFF AND NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
ROBERT TUCKER, PALMYRA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
MICHAEL GONZALEZ, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK BRADY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Wayne County (Dennis M. Kehoe, A.J.), entered April 18, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70. The judgment dismissed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. “The challenges by petitioner to the determination of the Administrative Law Judge following his final parole revocation hearing ‘could have been addressed in the course of [an] administrative appeal,’ and thus petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies” (People ex rel. Giguere v Barkley, 70 AD3d 1321, lv denied 14 NY3d 710; see People ex rel. Bratton v Mellas, 28 AD3d 1207, 1207-1208, lv denied 7 NY3d 705; see also 9 NYCRR 8006.3 [a], [b]). “Moreover, even if petitioner’s purported constitutional claims might otherwise ‘justify a departure from the general rule requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies’ . . ., habeas corpus relief nonetheless is unavailable as such claims, even if meritorious, would not entitle petitioner to immediate release” (People ex rel. Ariola v Sears, 53 AD3d 1001, 1002, lv denied 11 NY3d 710; see People ex rel. Wethington v Beaver, 306 AD2d 945, 946).
Entered: June 29, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
GONZALEZ, MICHAEL v. SHERIFF, WAYNE COUNTY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-michael-v-sheriff-wayne-county-nyappdiv-2012.