Gonzalez-Lucatero v. Holder

Ninth Circuit

Gonzalez-Lucatero v. Holder

333 F. App'x 229

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 28, 2009

DocketNo. 07-70344

StatusPublished

This text of 333 F. App'x 229 (Gonzalez-Lucatero v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzalez-Lucatero v. Holder, 333 F. App'x 229 (9th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Fernando Gonzalez-Lucatero, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary denial of Gonzalez-Lu-catero’s cancellation of removal application. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). Gonzalez-Lucatero’s contention that the agency violated his due process rights by disregarding his evidence of hardship and misapplying the law to the facts of his case is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable due process claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI