Gonzalez, Eduardo Guadalupe
This text of Gonzalez, Eduardo Guadalupe (Gonzalez, Eduardo Guadalupe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-93,468-01 AND WR-93,468-02
EX PARTE EDUARDO GUADALUPE GONZALEZ, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 2-19-0187-A AND 2-19-0188-A IN THE 382ND DISTRICT COURT FROM ROCKWALL COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of two charges of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to thirty
years’ imprisonment for each charge, to run concurrently. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his
convictions. Gonzalez v. State, Nos. 05-19-01085-CR and 05-19-01086-CR (Tex. App. — Dallas
January 21, 2021) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed these applications for writs of
habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See
TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective because counsel
advised Applicant to decline a plea offer and proceed to a jury trial without advising Applicant of
the potential punishment he could receive if found guilty at trial. 2
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly,
the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX .
CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to
Applicant’s claim. Specifically, trial counsel shall state whether the State made any plea offers in
this case. If the State did make any plea offers, trial counsel shall state whether he conveyed those
offers to Applicant, and shall state whether he advised Applicant of his likelihood of success at trial,
and of the potential punishment he could receive if found guilty at trial. Trial counsel shall state
whether he advised Applicant to decline any such plea offer. In developing the record, the trial court
may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall
determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by
counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM .
PROC . art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this
Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other
findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested 3
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: February 9, 2022 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gonzalez, Eduardo Guadalupe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzalez-eduardo-guadalupe-texcrimapp-2022.