Gonzales v. Taylor

W.D. Washington

Gonzales v. Taylor

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided January 25, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-01658·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE DANIEL GONZALES, CASE NO. 2:22-cv-01658-DGE- Plaintiff, BAT v. ORDER ADOPTING IN PART EDWARD TAYLOR et al, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. NO. Defendants. 3)

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 3) of the assigned, United States Magistrate Judge Brian A. Tsuchida, any objections, and the remaining record, the Court finds and ORDERS: (1) The Court ADOPTS in part the Report and Recommendation. (2) The case is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Porter v. Howard, 531 F. App’x 792, 793 (9th Cir. 2013) (“[I]f the court concludes that a prisoner has failed to exhaust, the proper remedy is dismissal of those claims without prejudice.”); see also Jackson v. Patzkowski, No. C18-1508-RSM-MLP, 2020 WL 13219613, at *15 (W.D. Wash. July 14, 2020), report and recommendation adopted, No. C18-1508-RSM-MLP, 2022 WL 1186208 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 21, 2022). (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the Plaintiff.

Dated this 25th day of January, 2023. A David G. Estudillo United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE DANIEL GONZALES, CASE NO. 2:22-cv-01658-DGE- Plaintiff, BAT v. ORDER ADOPTING IN PART EDWARD TAYLOR et al, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. NO. Defendants. 3)

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 3) of the assigned, United States Magistrate Judge Brian A. Tsuchida, any objections, and the remaining record, the Court finds and ORDERS: (1) The Court ADOPTS in part the Report and Recommendation. (2) The case is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Porter v. Howard, 531 F. App’x 792, 793 (9th Cir. 2013) (“[I]f the court concludes that a prisoner has failed to exhaust, the proper remedy is dismissal of those claims without prejudice.”); see also Jackson v. Patzkowski, No. C18-1508-RSM-MLP, 2020 WL 13219613, at *15 (W.D. Wash. July 14, 2020), report and recommendation adopted, No. C18-1508-RSM-MLP, 2022 WL 1186208 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 21, 2022). (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the Plaintiff.

Dated this 25th day of January, 2023. A David G. Estudillo United States District Judge

Gonzales v. Taylor, (W.D. Wash. 2023).

Pincite

Gonzales v. Taylor (Gonzales v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related