Gonzales v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Gonzales v. State

776 S.W.2d 197, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 154, 1989 WL 104643

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedSeptember 13, 1989

DocketNo. 518-89

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 776 S.W.2d 197 (Gonzales v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzales v. State, 776 S.W.2d 197, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 154, 1989 WL 104643 (Tex. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury for burglary of a building, and the trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by a prior conviction, at twenty years confinement. The conviction was affirmed. Gonzales v. State, 766 S.W.2d 395 (Tex.App.-Austin 1989). Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review raising one ground for review.

We have considered the issues raised and find that the Court of Appeals reached the correct result. The petition for discretionary review will be refused. As is true in every case where this Court refuses a petition for discretionary review, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. See Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

With this understanding, appellant’s petition for discretionary review is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI