Gonzales v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Gonzales v. State

209 S.W. 742, 85 Tex. Crim. 6

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gonzales v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 Tex. Crim. 248 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 5, 1919·No. No. 5332·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, P.' J.

Appellant was convicted of receiving and concealing stolen property, his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

[743]*743There were two special charges asked, one of which was given and the other refused. The other matters presented by the motion for new trial cannot be reviewed without the testimony, as they relate to and depend upon the facts. The evidence is not before the court; it does not accompany the transcript.

The judgment is affirmed. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, P.' J.

Appellant was convicted of receiving and concealing stolen property, his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

[743]*743There were two special charges asked, one of which was given and the other refused. The other matters presented by the motion for new trial cannot be reviewed without the testimony, as they relate to and depend upon the facts. The evidence is not before the court; it does not accompany the transcript.

The judgment is affirmed. '

Gonzales v. State, 209 S.W. 742, 85 Tex. Crim. 6 (Tex. 1919).

Pincite

209 S.W. 742 (Gonzales v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.