Gonzales v. State

32 So. 3d 198, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5337, 2010 WL 1628765
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gonzales v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 993 So. 2d 55
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 23, 2010·No. 2D09-5674·Published

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Jesus Gonzales appeals the summary denial of his motion seeking credit for time served, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the postconviction court’s order denying the claims it addressed; however, we remand this case to the postconviction court for further proceedings on the additional claims of credit that the court failed to address.

In its order denying Mr. Gonzales’s motion, the postconviction court failed to determine whether Mr. Gonzales is entitled to credit for fourteen days between January 2003 and February 2003, allegedly spent in the Hillsborough County jail, and for four months and two weeks between February 2003 and July 2003, allegedly spent in a south Florida evaluations and treatment facility. To the extent Mr. Gonzales’s allegations are true, he is certainly entitled to credit for time spent in the Hillsborough County jail between January and February 2003. He may also be entitled to credit for time spent in a treatment facility. See Tal-Mason v. State, 515 So.2d 738, 740 (Fla.1987) (holding that a defendant must be granted credit for time served “in any institution serving as the functional equivalent of a county jail”).

Because the postconviction court failed to address two of Mr. Gonzales’s claims for credit, we must remand this case for further proceedings.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

DAVIS and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gonzales v. State, 32 So. 3d 198, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5337, 2010 WL 1628765 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

32 So. 3d 198 (Gonzales v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tal-Mason v. State
515 So. 2d 738 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)